<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 3 Patch Management Do’s and Don’ts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-3-patch-management-dos-donts</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-28228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3208#comment-28228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tana
I like how you changed CIOs to gods...I guess you worked there too! And you&#039;re spot on; every time one of them questioned why a project was still not done, it came back to the fact that without the maintenance window, we couldn&#039;t put in the upgrade necessary to proceed. Come maintenance window time, they would still not approve!
Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tana<br />
I like how you changed CIOs to gods&#8230;I guess you worked there too! And you&#8217;re spot on; every time one of them questioned why a project was still not done, it came back to the fact that without the maintenance window, we couldn&#8217;t put in the upgrade necessary to proceed. Come maintenance window time, they would still not approve!<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-28227</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3208#comment-28227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jack, 
Glad to hear I am not alone in that...it seems so obvious, yet almost every time I go somewhere new, it&#039;s a new concept to them.
Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack,<br />
Glad to hear I am not alone in that&#8230;it seems so obvious, yet almost every time I go somewhere new, it&#8217;s a new concept to them.<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tana George</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-27713</link>
		<dc:creator>Tana George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3208#comment-27713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often forget that the technical aspects of patching are just a drop in the sea, compared to all the bureaucracy that goes with it. Your story about the 7 gods that had all to agree on a patch window reminds me how inflexible organizations are. And if something goes wrong, it makes no sense to explain that the reason is that the patch couldn&#039;t be done on time due to bureaucratic rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often forget that the technical aspects of patching are just a drop in the sea, compared to all the bureaucracy that goes with it. Your story about the 7 gods that had all to agree on a patch window reminds me how inflexible organizations are. And if something goes wrong, it makes no sense to explain that the reason is that the patch couldn&#8217;t be done on time due to bureaucratic rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Eastman</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/top-3-patch-management-dos-donts/comment-page-1/#comment-27710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3208#comment-27710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t tell you how important Do #3 is. I spent 5 years working with a vendor for a very high-demand client, and our scheduling team could never get their apps working because a simple patch to their software was postponed for, no joke, over a year. Maybe it&#039;s inconvenient at times, but the temporary loss of productivity is easily made up over time when you patch critical bugs or errors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t tell you how important Do #3 is. I spent 5 years working with a vendor for a very high-demand client, and our scheduling team could never get their apps working because a simple patch to their software was postponed for, no joke, over a year. Maybe it&#8217;s inconvenient at times, but the temporary loss of productivity is easily made up over time when you patch critical bugs or errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 14:29:54 by W3 Total Cache --