<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling security in a contracting economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/selling-security-contracting-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/selling-security-contracting-economy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=selling-security-contracting-economy</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Scott (CEO)</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/selling-security-contracting-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Scott (CEO)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=483#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monitoring employees’ web activity goes beyond simply checking who is doing what online and how much time is spent browsing the internet. I would agree that creative and productive employees do not need monitoring, but there are other employees who do not always pull their weight within the organization. Apart from possibly wasting time, these employees have a negative impact on those around them. Hardworking employees do not take kindly to colleagues who waste time while they are working hard to meet deadlines. With monitoring in place, management has a front-line view of internet activity in the company.

A wise manager will not criticize productive employees who spend a few minutes on their social networking site or reading Yahoo news, for example. Yet, managers are also duty bound to stop those who are abusing the system (internet access is not an employee right) for the company’s sake and the good of those who work hard.

Another point I would like to make is that monitoring is not limited to checking who is browsing the internet. Web monitoring and filtering is key to preventing malware from being downloaded and infecting the network. It only takes one employee to visit a poisoned website. It also only takes one employ to visit an inappropriate website.

What we often forget is that we are living in a society that is becoming increasingly litigious. Businesses are sued and dragged before the courts for even the most absurd of reasons, and yet businesses cannot afford to be caught napping. Web monitoring and web filtering give business owners the ammunition they need to counter any claims from clients or employees. In an employment dispute, for example, you may need web browsing reports on an employee who is suing for unfair dismissal. If you can prove that he or she spent excessive time on the internet or accessed inappropriate sites instead of working, you’ve won the case. Without that evidence, you have a very weak hand. It is also management’s fiduciary responsibility to have the data for when it is needed.

The risks are too high for businesses today. It is not a case of ‘big brother’ but rather one of ‘keeping alert’ and being ‘prepared’.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monitoring employees’ web activity goes beyond simply checking who is doing what online and how much time is spent browsing the internet. I would agree that creative and productive employees do not need monitoring, but there are other employees who do not always pull their weight within the organization. Apart from possibly wasting time, these employees have a negative impact on those around them. Hardworking employees do not take kindly to colleagues who waste time while they are working hard to meet deadlines. With monitoring in place, management has a front-line view of internet activity in the company.</p>
<p>A wise manager will not criticize productive employees who spend a few minutes on their social networking site or reading Yahoo news, for example. Yet, managers are also duty bound to stop those who are abusing the system (internet access is not an employee right) for the company’s sake and the good of those who work hard.</p>
<p>Another point I would like to make is that monitoring is not limited to checking who is browsing the internet. Web monitoring and filtering is key to preventing malware from being downloaded and infecting the network. It only takes one employee to visit a poisoned website. It also only takes one employ to visit an inappropriate website.</p>
<p>What we often forget is that we are living in a society that is becoming increasingly litigious. Businesses are sued and dragged before the courts for even the most absurd of reasons, and yet businesses cannot afford to be caught napping. Web monitoring and web filtering give business owners the ammunition they need to counter any claims from clients or employees. In an employment dispute, for example, you may need web browsing reports on an employee who is suing for unfair dismissal. If you can prove that he or she spent excessive time on the internet or accessed inappropriate sites instead of working, you’ve won the case. Without that evidence, you have a very weak hand. It is also management’s fiduciary responsibility to have the data for when it is needed.</p>
<p>The risks are too high for businesses today. It is not a case of ‘big brother’ but rather one of ‘keeping alert’ and being ‘prepared’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBelgian</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/selling-security-contracting-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBelgian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=483#comment-16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A company who feels the need to monitor their employees&#039; Internet activity to ensure they are productive should ask themselves whether such &quot;big brother&quot; like practices are really the solution.  If their employees truly are their best asset, I really question this approach.  Companies which do have highly creative and productive employees tend to follow the play hard, work hard approach.  Productivity should be managed by the work they actually produce rather than the time spend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company who feels the need to monitor their employees&#8217; Internet activity to ensure they are productive should ask themselves whether such &#8220;big brother&#8221; like practices are really the solution.  If their employees truly are their best asset, I really question this approach.  Companies which do have highly creative and productive employees tend to follow the play hard, work hard approach.  Productivity should be managed by the work they actually produce rather than the time spend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-09-15 06:46:56 by W3 Total Cache --