<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security education: ineffective or the wrong approach?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/security-education-ineffective-wrong-approach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/security-education-ineffective-wrong-approach/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=security-education-ineffective-wrong-approach</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/security-education-ineffective-wrong-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=257#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@GeeksAreSexy

Very true. However, end-users are closer to potential problems and are often the first to identify security incidents. The goal of an awareness program is often to change attitudes to technology and to help employees appreciate the value of the data and technology they are using. And this takes time and repetition. As you rightly point out, it only takes one employee to ruin all the hard work. At the same time, though, I would prefer my risk to be limited to that one employee, if the remaining 49, for argument’s sake, are alert and aware of the consequences of their actions. Long-term, I believe, there is value in having an educated and alert workforce.

Thanks for your comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GeeksAreSexy</p>
<p>Very true. However, end-users are closer to potential problems and are often the first to identify security incidents. The goal of an awareness program is often to change attitudes to technology and to help employees appreciate the value of the data and technology they are using. And this takes time and repetition. As you rightly point out, it only takes one employee to ruin all the hard work. At the same time, though, I would prefer my risk to be limited to that one employee, if the remaining 49, for argument’s sake, are alert and aware of the consequences of their actions. Long-term, I believe, there is value in having an educated and alert workforce.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/security-education-ineffective-wrong-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=257#comment-12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know what they say... Security is only as strong as its weakest link.. Sure, security awareness certainly can&#039;t hurt, but it only takes 1 person to make all your noble, precious efforts useless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what they say&#8230; Security is only as strong as its weakest link.. Sure, security awareness certainly can&#8217;t hurt, but it only takes 1 person to make all your noble, precious efforts useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-09-15 04:26:19 by W3 Total Cache --