<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: The Most Vulnerable Operating Systems and Applications in 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Gis Bun</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-54217</link>
		<dc:creator>Gis Bun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 21:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=10279#comment-54217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to recent reports by Symantec and Secuna [if I read the reports right], Chrome browser was the #2 ranked most vulnerable browser after Safari.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to recent reports by Symantec and Secuna [if I read the reports right], Chrome browser was the #2 ranked most vulnerable browser after Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauro Castiglione</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-47371</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauro Castiglione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=10279#comment-47371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very very interesting.
We already knew the facts, appliances are far more vulnerable than operating systems, not the figures, and number matter, shurely they matter!
What about the sources?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very very interesting.<br />
We already knew the facts, appliances are far more vulnerable than operating systems, not the figures, and number matter, shurely they matter!<br />
What about the sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/report-the-most-vulnerable-operating-systems-and-applications-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-44658</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=10279#comment-44658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting Data i must say, well done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting Data i must say, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 10:25:53 by W3 Total Cache --