<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Privacy Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=privacy-dead</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Carabott</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9249</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Carabott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-9249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Louise 

That was, in fact, one of the points in the article. It&#039;s true, some people see the privacy issue but ultimately seem to decide to ignore it. Others seem not to see the issues at all or see them and still believe that nothing bad will ever happen to them. Dennis might still be right however. Those people that are not aware or believe they&#039;re immune will very likely change their opinion once they become victims. With social networking become more popular more people will likely be targeted so there might be a critical mass at some point as when enough people get bitten peer pressure will force change.

Its obviously just speculation but quite possible I believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Louise </p>
<p>That was, in fact, one of the points in the article. It&#8217;s true, some people see the privacy issue but ultimately seem to decide to ignore it. Others seem not to see the issues at all or see them and still believe that nothing bad will ever happen to them. Dennis might still be right however. Those people that are not aware or believe they&#8217;re immune will very likely change their opinion once they become victims. With social networking become more popular more people will likely be targeted so there might be a critical mass at some point as when enough people get bitten peer pressure will force change.</p>
<p>Its obviously just speculation but quite possible I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise Mck.</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-9094</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise Mck.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-9094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Daniel @Dennis 

It’s funny how both of you mention some sort of social backlash due to the lack social networking security. But isn’t Facebook and Chatroulette already feeling the brunt of this backlash? A good number of users have been very vocal about the lack of privacy, but it’s not like this “backlash” has done any sort of damage to the user base. These users still haven’t stopped using these sites, neither have they started migrating to try any others. It seems like the world is addicted to social networking, whether it’s healthy for them or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel @Dennis </p>
<p>It’s funny how both of you mention some sort of social backlash due to the lack social networking security. But isn’t Facebook and Chatroulette already feeling the brunt of this backlash? A good number of users have been very vocal about the lack of privacy, but it’s not like this “backlash” has done any sort of damage to the user base. These users still haven’t stopped using these sites, neither have they started migrating to try any others. It seems like the world is addicted to social networking, whether it’s healthy for them or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Carabott</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8974</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Carabott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right Daniel. It seems there is a new culture emerging which thinks privacy is not that important anymore; or, maybe more to the point, that it&#039;s not a big deal when you yourself ignore your own privacy. It seem the story changes when other people try to take your privacy away, as monitoring is still a controversial subject.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Daniel. It seems there is a new culture emerging which thinks privacy is not that important anymore; or, maybe more to the point, that it&#8217;s not a big deal when you yourself ignore your own privacy. It seem the story changes when other people try to take your privacy away, as monitoring is still a controversial subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bruce

I predict a sort of social backlash (of more than the vocal variety) in the next decade or so. With the internet cracking user profiles open like a nutcracker in Christmas, it’s only a matter of time until the world implodes under the sheer weight of its own lack of security. How that backlash will go, I can’t really say. But I’m predicting it will literally change how we interact, and socially network online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bruce</p>
<p>I predict a sort of social backlash (of more than the vocal variety) in the next decade or so. With the internet cracking user profiles open like a nutcracker in Christmas, it’s only a matter of time until the world implodes under the sheer weight of its own lack of security. How that backlash will go, I can’t really say. But I’m predicting it will literally change how we interact, and socially network online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Facebook facing heavy criticism for its failed security measures, it looks like this topic won’t be going away soon. Strangely enough, the world doesn’t seem to be bothered. With the advent of Twitter and Chatroulette, the masses seem to be embracing more security liabilities instead of avoiding them. I’m thinking there has to be some sort of backlash in the future. Privacy may not yet be dead, but it’s surely dying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Facebook facing heavy criticism for its failed security measures, it looks like this topic won’t be going away soon. Strangely enough, the world doesn’t seem to be bothered. With the advent of Twitter and Chatroulette, the masses seem to be embracing more security liabilities instead of avoiding them. I’m thinking there has to be some sort of backlash in the future. Privacy may not yet be dead, but it’s surely dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Carabott</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8516</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Carabott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Delois 

In principle I agree with you, everyone should be free to do what they want. If someone wants to advertise their social security number online it&#039;s their choice. However like you correctly said some people do not realize what the repercussions of their actions will be and that&#039;s the core problem. The big question then is how should you act towards these people? Ideally you would educate them but that&#039;s not always possible.  You could also ignore the problem and leave everyone free to act as they wish but it&#039;s not really that simple either. What happens if such a person writes about things which are damaging to his/her employer? What if they write about security issues that put their company at risk?  What if they write things which make their company liable?

I agree everyone should be free to act in any way they wish, this also means that businesses can also act in any way they wish, the problem is striking a balance between the two. It&#039;s not easy and there is no clear answer unfortunately.

@ Bruce

It&#039;s not just Facebook really, targeted marketing is a big thing. A lot of businesses try to do it. Some use the terms you search for to decide what Ads to show you, others try to guess what you like by using the contents of the page you visit (that is displaying the Ad) and some go even further than that and try to track every page you visit by installing adware/spyware on your machine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Delois </p>
<p>In principle I agree with you, everyone should be free to do what they want. If someone wants to advertise their social security number online it&#8217;s their choice. However like you correctly said some people do not realize what the repercussions of their actions will be and that&#8217;s the core problem. The big question then is how should you act towards these people? Ideally you would educate them but that&#8217;s not always possible.  You could also ignore the problem and leave everyone free to act as they wish but it&#8217;s not really that simple either. What happens if such a person writes about things which are damaging to his/her employer? What if they write about security issues that put their company at risk?  What if they write things which make their company liable?</p>
<p>I agree everyone should be free to act in any way they wish, this also means that businesses can also act in any way they wish, the problem is striking a balance between the two. It&#8217;s not easy and there is no clear answer unfortunately.</p>
<p>@ Bruce</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just Facebook really, targeted marketing is a big thing. A lot of businesses try to do it. Some use the terms you search for to decide what Ads to show you, others try to guess what you like by using the contents of the page you visit (that is displaying the Ad) and some go even further than that and try to track every page you visit by installing adware/spyware on your machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8490</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the internet, it should be automatically assumed that whatever you send online is not 100% private and secure. Take Facebook for example. Does anyone notice that the ads you are getting seem to be somehow related to the recent searches or mentions you have done online? Example, if you are searching for pregnancy related terms, you seem to be getting pregnancy or baby related ads. Why is that?

Yes, they KNOW what you are doing online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the internet, it should be automatically assumed that whatever you send online is not 100% private and secure. Take Facebook for example. Does anyone notice that the ads you are getting seem to be somehow related to the recent searches or mentions you have done online? Example, if you are searching for pregnancy related terms, you seem to be getting pregnancy or baby related ads. Why is that?</p>
<p>Yes, they KNOW what you are doing online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delois Blanche</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8489</link>
		<dc:creator>Delois Blanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think people have the right to share what they want to share regardless of whether it&#039;ll get them in trouble or not, provided that they are aware of what they are doing, and what could be the consequences. Sadly, a lot of them do not always have the common sense to consider the repercussions of their actions. Common sense isn&#039;t common after all. 

But the worse thing is, there are those who purposely invade other people&#039;s privacy without their permission and consent. I think it&#039;s about time that something serious should be done about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people have the right to share what they want to share regardless of whether it&#8217;ll get them in trouble or not, provided that they are aware of what they are doing, and what could be the consequences. Sadly, a lot of them do not always have the common sense to consider the repercussions of their actions. Common sense isn&#8217;t common after all. </p>
<p>But the worse thing is, there are those who purposely invade other people&#8217;s privacy without their permission and consent. I think it&#8217;s about time that something serious should be done about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Carabott</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8452</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Carabott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Sue,

It would have been nice if companies inform when they discover credit cards have been compromised. I do wonder however how many people would actually pro actively cancel their credit cards if they&#039;re informed these might have been compromised!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sue,</p>
<p>It would have been nice if companies inform when they discover credit cards have been compromised. I do wonder however how many people would actually pro actively cancel their credit cards if they&#8217;re informed these might have been compromised!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/privacy-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8393</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 04:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2556#comment-8393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article! It&#039;s true-no one really thinks about online privacy until theirs is breeched. They rely on the companies they do business with to keep their info safe and private and that&#039;s not always a good idea. 

That&#039;s terrible about your credit card. I&#039;m guessing either whatever company had their data breeched didn&#039;t realize it or it fell into the hands of a rogue employee at one of them. I was caught up in the Heartland data breech. I got a letter from my bank telling me they had been informed that their customer&#039;s cards had been affected so they were canceling them and replacing them with new ones. I was fortunate that no fraudulent transactions had occurred!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! It&#8217;s true-no one really thinks about online privacy until theirs is breeched. They rely on the companies they do business with to keep their info safe and private and that&#8217;s not always a good idea. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s terrible about your credit card. I&#8217;m guessing either whatever company had their data breeched didn&#8217;t realize it or it fell into the hands of a rogue employee at one of them. I was caught up in the Heartland data breech. I got a letter from my bank telling me they had been informed that their customer&#8217;s cards had been affected so they were canceling them and replacing them with new ones. I was fortunate that no fraudulent transactions had occurred!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 16:31:50 by W3 Total Cache --