<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mind that password&#8230; again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/mind-password-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/mind-password-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mind-password-2</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/mind-password-2/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=1472#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John. Interesting idea. My only concern would be users&#039; ability to lose the USB stick. The solution would have to be such that even in the event that the drive is lost, it is useless to the person finding it. I believe that so long as there is a human at the end of the process there are always going to be security issues. In your scenario, though, the risks would be much lower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John. Interesting idea. My only concern would be users&#8217; ability to lose the USB stick. The solution would have to be such that even in the event that the drive is lost, it is useless to the person finding it. I believe that so long as there is a human at the end of the process there are always going to be security issues. In your scenario, though, the risks would be much lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mello</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/mind-password-2/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=1472#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact of the matter is that to most users secure passwords are just too inconvenient to deal with. Moreover, the sheer volume of passwords imposed on users mitigates against them creating unique and secure passwords constantly. What&#039;s needed is some kind of USB solution that will generate secure passwords with minimal user interaction. The solution should include some kind of &quot;cloud&quot; component so that the contents of the USB device is backed up whenever the data on it changes so if it&#039;s lost or corrupted, it can be restored with a minimum of pain. Only be removing the demand on users to memorize and create secure passwords will the use of secure passwords actually occur.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact of the matter is that to most users secure passwords are just too inconvenient to deal with. Moreover, the sheer volume of passwords imposed on users mitigates against them creating unique and secure passwords constantly. What&#8217;s needed is some kind of USB solution that will generate secure passwords with minimal user interaction. The solution should include some kind of &#8220;cloud&#8221; component so that the contents of the USB device is backed up whenever the data on it changes so if it&#8217;s lost or corrupted, it can be restored with a minimum of pain. Only be removing the demand on users to memorize and create secure passwords will the use of secure passwords actually occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 15:06:56 by W3 Total Cache --