<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Need for Internet Monitoring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=internet-monitoring-2</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Carabott</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29187</link>
		<dc:creator>Emmanuel Carabott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3221#comment-29187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bob,

The Internet monitoring subject changes depending on the context of who is doing the monitoring and for what purpose. 

This article is intended to address a company monitoring its Internet activity for security purposes. It is recommended that a company would do its own monitoring and not have external companies such as the teleco company doing the monitoring for it.

The intention primarily shouldn&#039;t be to spy on your employees and intrude on their privacy but rather to ensure the safety of the company&#039;s infrastructure. I know most companies will not resist the temptation and use such a system to monitor what an employee is browsing online; however, as it stands right now, provided they advise their employees, they can do that freely in the US. Other countries have other rules in that regard. 

That being said, a work environment is definitely not a place where anyone should expect privacy regarding their online activity. So personally I do not believe that anyone can expect their company to put itself at risk and not do any Internet monitoring for privacy&#039;s sake. Don&#039;t get me wrong I am not claiming that privacy is not important, it&#039;s just that I believe there is a distinction between monitoring and spying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>The Internet monitoring subject changes depending on the context of who is doing the monitoring and for what purpose. </p>
<p>This article is intended to address a company monitoring its Internet activity for security purposes. It is recommended that a company would do its own monitoring and not have external companies such as the teleco company doing the monitoring for it.</p>
<p>The intention primarily shouldn&#8217;t be to spy on your employees and intrude on their privacy but rather to ensure the safety of the company&#8217;s infrastructure. I know most companies will not resist the temptation and use such a system to monitor what an employee is browsing online; however, as it stands right now, provided they advise their employees, they can do that freely in the US. Other countries have other rules in that regard. </p>
<p>That being said, a work environment is definitely not a place where anyone should expect privacy regarding their online activity. So personally I do not believe that anyone can expect their company to put itself at risk and not do any Internet monitoring for privacy&#8217;s sake. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I am not claiming that privacy is not important, it&#8217;s just that I believe there is a distinction between monitoring and spying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob morton from Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29141</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob morton from Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 03:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3221#comment-29141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are mobile, Internet monitoring is a BIG NO NO. Aside from it can track your visited websites and online activity, this system can also track where you are. This is scary. Where&#039;s our privacy going?

Companies, telcos, and mobile phone carriers should list the privacy implications of their terms of service. Privacy agreements, non-disclosure agreements, and the likes, should be served to consumers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are mobile, Internet monitoring is a BIG NO NO. Aside from it can track your visited websites and online activity, this system can also track where you are. This is scary. Where&#8217;s our privacy going?</p>
<p>Companies, telcos, and mobile phone carriers should list the privacy implications of their terms of service. Privacy agreements, non-disclosure agreements, and the likes, should be served to consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Sulivan</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29005</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Sulivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3221#comment-29005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, security issues triumphed over privacy. Take for instance in airports, security officers are allowed to frisk and check your body (from head to toe) and your baggage for the sake of security, neverminding your privacy at all.

Internet monitoring is also the same with this setting. The only difference is it&#039;s not personal or physical. 

We should adhere to Internet monitoring for the sake of our and everyone&#039;s security.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, security issues triumphed over privacy. Take for instance in airports, security officers are allowed to frisk and check your body (from head to toe) and your baggage for the sake of security, neverminding your privacy at all.</p>
<p>Internet monitoring is also the same with this setting. The only difference is it&#8217;s not personal or physical. </p>
<p>We should adhere to Internet monitoring for the sake of our and everyone&#8217;s security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Laney</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/internet-monitoring-2/comment-page-1/#comment-28978</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Laney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3221#comment-28978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only does internet monitoring keep users safe, but it also helps people stay on task. Overall, no company should be without a strategy regarding internet monitoring. There&#039;s nothing to lose by implementing a system for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does internet monitoring keep users safe, but it also helps people stay on task. Overall, no company should be without a strategy regarding internet monitoring. There&#8217;s nothing to lose by implementing a system for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-09-15 05:30:07 by W3 Total Cache --