<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delivering the Secret to Success in IT Support</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delivering-secret-success-support</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Van</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/comment-page-1/#comment-17210</link>
		<dc:creator>Van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2003#comment-17210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Nic

Unfortunately, from a consultation and advisory standpoint, many clients waste valuable time, effort and resources in exploring different options, only to come out undecided in the end. Despite the fact that I agree with presenting the client with options, it’s always best to be able to guide them quickly, and efficiently, on what track to take. I think consultation and advisory firms should be more than aggressive with this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nic</p>
<p>Unfortunately, from a consultation and advisory standpoint, many clients waste valuable time, effort and resources in exploring different options, only to come out undecided in the end. Despite the fact that I agree with presenting the client with options, it’s always best to be able to guide them quickly, and efficiently, on what track to take. I think consultation and advisory firms should be more than aggressive with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/comment-page-1/#comment-15574</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2003#comment-15574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;do we ask them to do something because it suits our mission but puts their reputation for integrity at risk?&quot;

That&#039;d definitely a tough act to balance. But I think giving  customers as many options as possible is always a good thing. It should never be beyond  the core competencies (or resources) of your company of course, but having the ability to walk your customers through as many scenarios as possible is always plus. However, it&#039;s always important to provide them the transparency they deserve as they examine each and every one of their choices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;do we ask them to do something because it suits our mission but puts their reputation for integrity at risk?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;d definitely a tough act to balance. But I think giving  customers as many options as possible is always a good thing. It should never be beyond  the core competencies (or resources) of your company of course, but having the ability to walk your customers through as many scenarios as possible is always plus. However, it&#8217;s always important to provide them the transparency they deserve as they examine each and every one of their choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/comment-page-1/#comment-4389</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2003#comment-4389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ty. 

Thanks for the comment. 

I wholeheartedly agree.  Having run a &#039;real world&#039; IT Support Co - it&#039;s tough to convince all your customers that recurring fee is the way to go. So we ended up running both break/fix and managed services side by side. 

I actually used GFIMAX RM in both cases: 
Managed Services for efficiency 
Break Fix - to drive extra revenue/hw sales and to tie wandering break fix customers into our services. 

And because it was &#039;pay in arrears&#039; and only for what you used - economically it worked well for us as GFI MAX&#039;s cost were low enough to generate a return in both cases. 

All the best, 
Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ty. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. </p>
<p>I wholeheartedly agree.  Having run a &#8216;real world&#8217; IT Support Co &#8211; it&#8217;s tough to convince all your customers that recurring fee is the way to go. So we ended up running both break/fix and managed services side by side. </p>
<p>I actually used GFIMAX RM in both cases:<br />
Managed Services for efficiency<br />
Break Fix &#8211; to drive extra revenue/hw sales and to tie wandering break fix customers into our services. </p>
<p>And because it was &#8216;pay in arrears&#8217; and only for what you used &#8211; economically it worked well for us as GFI MAX&#8217;s cost were low enough to generate a return in both cases. </p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Bohannon</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/comment-page-1/#comment-4334</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty Bohannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2003#comment-4334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris,

I have always had challenges with the value proposition &quot;you should own the licenses&quot; model that many of the &quot;big boy&quot; Remote Monitoring &amp; Management (RMM) providers have been promoting..it&#039;s challenging to make the ROI meet the road for both the MSP and the end customer.

Especially with a major factor of the ROI equation being recouped over time. With the current economic pressures on our customers to cut costs, and traditional MSP services quickly becoming a commodity as the major telco&#039;s and even office supply companies (Staples) enter as competitors...we MSP&#039;s need &quot;reasonable solutions at reasonable prices&quot; now - not in 1-2 years.

We have found GFIMax to be a refreshing affordable approach to staying competitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>I have always had challenges with the value proposition &#8220;you should own the licenses&#8221; model that many of the &#8220;big boy&#8221; Remote Monitoring &amp; Management (RMM) providers have been promoting..it&#8217;s challenging to make the ROI meet the road for both the MSP and the end customer.</p>
<p>Especially with a major factor of the ROI equation being recouped over time. With the current economic pressures on our customers to cut costs, and traditional MSP services quickly becoming a commodity as the major telco&#8217;s and even office supply companies (Staples) enter as competitors&#8230;we MSP&#8217;s need &#8220;reasonable solutions at reasonable prices&#8221; now &#8211; not in 1-2 years.</p>
<p>We have found GFIMax to be a refreshing affordable approach to staying competitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/delivering-secret-success-support/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=2003#comment-4290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely bang on the mark.  

We looked at Kaseya, etc and it would have meant re-engineering too much of our business too fast to get a return on the investment 

Some of our customers, especially professional services are used to billing by the hour and are reluctant to so called managed services deals.  

We like that GFI don&#039;t force us to do that. 

Vic]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely bang on the mark.  </p>
<p>We looked at Kaseya, etc and it would have meant re-engineering too much of our business too fast to get a return on the investment </p>
<p>Some of our customers, especially professional services are used to billing by the hour and are reluctant to so called managed services deals.  </p>
<p>We like that GFI don&#8217;t force us to do that. </p>
<p>Vic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 13:11:59 by W3 Total Cache --