Comments on: A Deeper Look at Spam and Malware Filtering with Exchange Server http://www.gfi.com/blog/a-deeper-look-at-spam-and-malware-filtering-with-exchange-server/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-deeper-look-at-spam-and-malware-filtering-with-exchange-server Brought to you by GFI Software Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:27:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Donald Manson http://www.gfi.com/blog/a-deeper-look-at-spam-and-malware-filtering-with-exchange-server/comment-page-1/#comment-32366 Donald Manson Mon, 30 Apr 2012 02:57:33 +0000 http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=8484#comment-32366 And what is the advantage of using Third Party solutions instead of using Edge Transport? Why would “autonomy” be important?

Judging from what was written here, it is better to Edge Transport, instead.

This is not exactly a “deeper” look at various filtering options. It simply describes the features of each and points out the most obvious disadvantage of each type.

A tabular form of comparison based on various factors would be more helpful. Don’t get me wrong. This article has been a bit helpful. But the title is just “deceptive”, for the lack of a better term, or the article fails to deliver on what the title says it should be about.

]]> By: Lucas Roberts http://www.gfi.com/blog/a-deeper-look-at-spam-and-malware-filtering-with-exchange-server/comment-page-1/#comment-32295 Lucas Roberts Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:16:05 +0000 http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=8484#comment-32295 I always looked at the Edge Transport Server as the bouncer at a nightclub. You can operate your business without one, but it might get crowded, and you might get unsavory characters coming inside. With it in place, you can make sure that only the messages you want to come on in are making it past the front door.

]]>