<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 16 Most (Potentially) Dangerous Applications on your Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network</link>
	<description>Brought to you by GFI Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatima Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29283</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatima Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Adobes are known for their insecurities and vulnerabilities against (I think) almost all types of malwares. Take for instance Adobe Reader. According to ZDnet, in 2010, among the most commonly used document-based software (Adobe Reader and MS Powerpoint, Word, &amp; Excel), it is the most targeted application. 

Even frequent updates could not stop viruses from attacking the Reader. In fact, there are times when this software is exploited once a month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Adobes are known for their insecurities and vulnerabilities against (I think) almost all types of malwares. Take for instance Adobe Reader. According to ZDnet, in 2010, among the most commonly used document-based software (Adobe Reader and MS Powerpoint, Word, &amp; Excel), it is the most targeted application. </p>
<p>Even frequent updates could not stop viruses from attacking the Reader. In fact, there are times when this software is exploited once a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29208</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember back in 2009, Adobe was hit pretty hard with the Gumblar attacks - so I&#039;m still weary of running Adobe products on my Windows box because I don&#039;t believe they ever actually fixed the issue.  For those that don&#039;t recall Gumblar, it&#039;s that nasty virus that stole user FTP login credentials through sniffed network traffic and local FTP clients, resulting in the defacements of millions of websites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember back in 2009, Adobe was hit pretty hard with the Gumblar attacks &#8211; so I&#8217;m still weary of running Adobe products on my Windows box because I don&#8217;t believe they ever actually fixed the issue.  For those that don&#8217;t recall Gumblar, it&#8217;s that nasty virus that stole user FTP login credentials through sniffed network traffic and local FTP clients, resulting in the defacements of millions of websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29201</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re welcome! I&#039;m glad you found it useful.
Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome! I&#8217;m glad you found it useful.<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29200</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points Justin, though many times what is not included with Windows has more to do with licensing than anything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points Justin, though many times what is not included with Windows has more to do with licensing than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29199</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely. Keeping your apps up to date is the best way to stay secure in the long term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. Keeping your apps up to date is the best way to stay secure in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GameMan1983,
I think you miss the point. IE is not in this list because it is patched with Windows Updates, WSUS, or SCCM. All of the apps listed above are third party, which means that clicking the box to automatically download and install updates doesn&#039;t cover them. Yes, both FF and Chrome, as well as practically all of the rest, have an update functionality, but it must be manually set by the user and cannot be controlled by the admin without third party software.
Ed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GameMan1983,<br />
I think you miss the point. IE is not in this list because it is patched with Windows Updates, WSUS, or SCCM. All of the apps listed above are third party, which means that clicking the box to automatically download and install updates doesn&#8217;t cover them. Yes, both FF and Chrome, as well as practically all of the rest, have an update functionality, but it must be manually set by the user and cannot be controlled by the admin without third party software.<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameMan1983</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29131</link>
		<dc:creator>GameMan1983</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ed,

Why is Internet Explorer not here? Is it safer than Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari? I don&#039;t think so. In fact, it&#039;s the least secure Internet browser.

I&#039;ve used several browsers before, sometimes 2 at a time. My current web browsers now are Firefox 4 and IE 9. I&#039;m just using IE 9 because I don&#039;t want my kids to see and access my Firefox bookmarks. 

On a head to head match, Firefox 4 will win on the feature category and IE 9 will have the upper hand in the design. Which one would you choose, functionality or design?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>Why is Internet Explorer not here? Is it safer than Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and Safari? I don&#8217;t think so. In fact, it&#8217;s the least secure Internet browser.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used several browsers before, sometimes 2 at a time. My current web browsers now are Firefox 4 and IE 9. I&#8217;m just using IE 9 because I don&#8217;t want my kids to see and access my Firefox bookmarks. </p>
<p>On a head to head match, Firefox 4 will win on the feature category and IE 9 will have the upper hand in the design. Which one would you choose, functionality or design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDG_IT_Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29110</link>
		<dc:creator>CDG_IT_Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 08:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Applications can only be dangerous when they&#039;re not updated. Take for instance Firefox. For me, it&#039;s the safest browser available today. But if you&#039;re stock with Firefox version 3.XXX, then prepare for the worst. 

Even if you have the latest and the most powerful paid anti-virus software, you should still update to the latest stable version (not beta of course) of all your applications.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Applications can only be dangerous when they&#8217;re not updated. Take for instance Firefox. For me, it&#8217;s the safest browser available today. But if you&#8217;re stock with Firefox version 3.XXX, then prepare for the worst. </p>
<p>Even if you have the latest and the most powerful paid anti-virus software, you should still update to the latest stable version (not beta of course) of all your applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29107</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 10:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is always a risk adopting these kinds of helpful &quot;universal applications&quot; in a corporate environment. I don&#039;t see why since Windows adopted built-in compression/decompression of .zip files why they don&#039;t continue to add support for .rars and .7zs, as those become more widespread.

Essentially, the scenario here is even if you put a security system in your house, if your kitchen window doesn&#039;t lock correctly, burglars can still get in. You&#039;re only as secure as your most vulnerable program, and I think if a piece of software hasn&#039;t updated to be appropriately patched for security, it should be discontinued from use inside of your company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is always a risk adopting these kinds of helpful &#8220;universal applications&#8221; in a corporate environment. I don&#8217;t see why since Windows adopted built-in compression/decompression of .zip files why they don&#8217;t continue to add support for .rars and .7zs, as those become more widespread.</p>
<p>Essentially, the scenario here is even if you put a security system in your house, if your kitchen window doesn&#8217;t lock correctly, burglars can still get in. You&#8217;re only as secure as your most vulnerable program, and I think if a piece of software hasn&#8217;t updated to be appropriately patched for security, it should be discontinued from use inside of your company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.gfi.com/blog/16-potentially-dangerous-applications-network/comment-page-1/#comment-29105</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gfi.com/blog/?p=3262#comment-29105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this nice list. I will use it as reference. I never bothered to remember which of these popular applications need to be updated manually and which are smart to check for updates automatically but now when this list is compiled, this will be of great help. I sometimes get update notifications from Firefox but I haven&#039;t paid attention if these are notifications that a new Firefox version is available, not that one of the extensions has a new version. Next time I get such an update, I will take the time to read it more carefully. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this nice list. I will use it as reference. I never bothered to remember which of these popular applications need to be updated manually and which are smart to check for updates automatically but now when this list is compiled, this will be of great help. I sometimes get update notifications from Firefox but I haven&#8217;t paid attention if these are notifications that a new Firefox version is available, not that one of the extensions has a new version. Next time I get such an update, I will take the time to read it more carefully. <img src='http://www.gfi.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.gfi.com @ 2013-08-12 14:23:29 by W3 Total Cache --